The BibleTruth.cc Torah Study Series Parashat Mattot "Tribes" Bamidbar [Numbers] 30:2-32:42 tAJêM; 30:1 Mosheh said to the heads of the tribes of Yisrael: "This is what Yahuwah commands:" The Hebrew mattot - tAJêM; - is variously translated as stick, staff, tribe. The staff or flag of a people represented the family, and thus the "stick" stood for the tribe. Theme The theme of Parashat Mattot Sedarim The Request of Re'uven and Gad Prophetic Pictures in this Week's Torah Portion Prophetic End Time Shadows in the Torah Parashah
30:2 When a man makes
a vow to Yahuwah or takes an oath to obligate himself by a pledge, he
must not break his word but must do everything he said. These chukim (statutes, prescribed things) are the most powerful statement in the Torah of Mosheh regarding the authority of a man over a woman. These laws indicate that a man has legal control over his wife, over his unmarried daughter living in her father's home. He has the authority to confirm or to nullify any oath or promise made by his wife or his daughter. Note well that "this is what Yahuwah commands" (see 30:1). This is not a chauvinistic attempt of man to have dominance over a woman. Yahuwah has commanded it to be this way. First, by way of contrast to the instructions which follow about women taking vows, this is the instruction for a man taking a vow. A man must always keep his word and his vow. There is never a circumstance in which a man does not have to keep a vow. Because a man is directly accountable to Elohim, he must be careful to speak responsibly.
The Torah teaches the sons of Yisrael to take all of their vows in his
name. Fear Yahuwah your
Elohim, serve him only and take your oaths in his name. (Devarim 6:13) Fear Yahuwah your Elohim and serve him.
Hold fast to him and take your oaths in his name. (Devarim 10:20)
Those who take their vows in the name of Yahuwah are considered to be
among the people whom Yahuwah calls his own:
But they must carefully learn to follow the religious practices of my
people. Once they taught my people to swear their oaths using the name
of the elohim Baal. But then, they must swear oaths using my name,
saying, "As surely as Yahuwah lives, I swear." If they do these things,
then they will be included among the people I call my own. But
I will completely uproot and destroy any of those nations that will not
pay heed,'" says Yahuwah (Yirmyahu 12:16,17). So, because all vows are to be taken in his name, anytime a vow is broken, the transgressor is profaning the name of Yahuwah. But there is also an explicit command in the Torah not to swear falsely: You must not swear falsely in my name, so that you do not profane the name of your Elohim. I am Yahuwah (Vayiqra [Leviticus] 19:12). Swearing falsely is taking a vow which you do not intend to fulfill. Thus, to break a vow damages the very character and reputation of the Almighty. Every vow taken is required to be kept and fulfilled. The Torah is adamant about this: When you make a vow to Yahuwah your Elohim you must not delay in fulfilling it, for otherwise he will surely hold you accountable as a sinner (Devarim [Deuteronomy] 23:21). And in the passage before us (Bamidbar 30:2), men are required to always keep their vows: When a man makes a vow to Yahuwah or takes an oath to obligate himself by a pledge, he must not break his word but must do everything he said. There is never any reason or excuse for a man to break his oath. He must keep them all. But, although men are always required to fulfill their every vow, woman are not always required to keep their vows. We shall examine a few cases of this in the sections that come next. Bamidbar 30:3-5 describes a scenario in which an exception is made to the law that all vows must be fulfilled. The situation described here is of a young woman, an unmarried woman, still living in her father's home. This woman can make any vow or pledge or promise she wants. But her father is able to nullify her vow if he so chooses, when he hears about her vow. There is no time line given as to when this option expires. Torah only says that when he hears about her vow, he has veto power over her promise and can therefore nullify any pledge she has made. When her father forbids her to keep this vow, Yahuwah releases her from that vow. This veto power the father has over his unmarried daughter who still lives under his roof surely indicates that he has authority over his daughter. Yahuwah considers his word to be the final say in the matter of her taking a vow. If her father permits the vow to stand, it stands. But if her father forbids the vow, it is rescinded. She then does not have to keep the vow. In fact, she is forbidden to do the thing she promised in the vow, because her father has forbidden it. Why does her father have this authority over her word? Clearly because the unmarried daughter living in her father's house is under her father's authority. He is her head. Her word only stands or falls on her father's confirmation or nullification of her promise. The next case is that of an unmarried woman living in her father's house who makes a vow. This time nothing is said about whether her father heard of her vow or not. But she then marries, and her new husband has now become her head. Now her husband has veto power over her vow when he hears about the vow she has made, even the vow she made before he married her. When her husband hears of the vow that she made before she became married to him, he has the authority to nullify her vow. And when he nullifies the vow, Yahuwah releases her from the vow. However, if her husband hears about the vow by which she obligated herself but says nothing about it, he is confirming the vow she made by his silence. The status of the oath from Yahuwah's point of view is dependent upon her husband either confirming or nullifying her oaths or promises. Just as the first case when the vow of an unmarried woman can be nullified by her father, when this woman marries, her husband takes over the headship authority over this woman and has veto power over her promises. It is clear from Scripture that a husband is head over his wife, so it should be equally obvious that the father of an unmarried woman is head over her for the same reasons. This headship relationship a father and a husband has over his unmarried daughter or his wife (as the case may be) is rooted in the creation order which we detailed earlier in this study. The third case is that of a married woman who takes a vow. As we would suspect from the previous case, the husband has full veto power over his wife's vows, pledges and promises. If, when her husband hears about her oath, he disapproves of this vow, then at his word her pledge is cancelled. Again, this authority the husband has over any promise or any oath or pledge a woman makes clearly indicates and demonstrates his headship over his wife and her submissive status to her husband. This account goes into more detail about the time frame in which the husband has to act to either confirm or nullify his wife's pledge. Here, it tells us that if he says nothing about the pledge his wife has made "from day to day" then he affirms the oath by his silence. The Hebrew literally says "from day to day," so it indicates that the man has but a short time to make the decision to nullify. He has enough time to consider the possible consequences of her oath and it seems that he has at least a day or two to decide. The exact amount of time is not specified, but he does have some time as the phrase "from day to day" would suggest. But if he takes more than a reasonable amount of time and remains silent, then the oath is confirmed by his silence. The fact that the father and husband of a woman has the legal right to confirm or nullify anything the woman promises or pledges in a vow suggests the man's authority over the woman in the family and in the community. These examples from the Torah support Paul's assertion that the Torah teaches that a woman must be submissive and therefore silent in the congregation.
31:1 Yahuwah said to Mosheh,
13
Mosheh, Eleazar the priest and all the leaders of the community went to
meet them outside the camp.
25 Yahuwah said to Mosheh,
The Request of Re'uven and Gad
32:1 The Reubenites and Gadites, who had very large herds and flocks,
saw that the lands of Jazer and Gilead were suitable for livestock.
Prophetic End
Time Shadows in the Torah Parashah
|